The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) has published an Opinion holding Cameroon responsible for unlawfully detaining prominent investigative journalist and blogger Tsi Conrad.
On 8 December 2016, Mr Conrad was arrested in Bamenda while filming a protest held by the ruling political party, the Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM). He was arrested at gunpoint, his camera was destroyed, and he was taken into custody by the police. He was held in pre-trial detention until May 2018 when he was convicted under anti-terrorism laws and sentenced to 14 years in prison. In September 2019, following his involvement in a protest over the conditions in Kondengui prison, he was convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to a further 18 months in prison.
In its Opinion the UNWGAD notes that both proceedings against him were brought because he was exercising his right to freedom of expression and to peaceful assembly. It also notes that the provisions of the national security and anti-terror laws used against him are vague and over-broad and the prosecutions therefore lack any lawful basis. The UNWGAD makes several other key findings in Mr Conrad’s case including that Mr Conrad’s trial before a military tribunal was a serious violation of his fair trial rights, including his right to appear before an independent and impartial court. This was in addition to the lack of due process within the criminal proceedings including no opportunity for Mr Conrad’s defence to call any witnesses. It also found that he was forced to confess to crimes he didn’t commit, was held incommunicado at the beginning of his detention and was subjected to torture and ill-treatment.
The UNWGAD Opinion concludes by finding his detention is arbitrary and recommends that he should be immediately released. It has also recommended that a full and independent investigation be undertaken into the circumstances of Mr Conrad’s detention.
Mr Conrad’s detention is consistent with the state’s policy of arbitrarily detaining journalists critical of the state. Often, journalists reporting on the Anglophone crisis are targeted by the authorities relying on anti-terrorism and national security legislation in an effort to stop their reporting. They are often held for lengthy periods in pre-trial detention in circumstances where they have no access to a legal representative. The UNWGAD’s Opinion recognises that other human rights mechanisms have also observed this pattern, whereby journalists, especially those working in the context of reporting on the crisis in the English-speaking regions in the country, are detained in Cameroon for their work.
In recognition of the seriousness of the human rights violations committed against Mr Conrad, the UNWGAD referred the case to the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to liberty, opinion and expression, to the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of assembly peace and freedom of association, to the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the fight against terrorism, to the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, and the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, so that they can take appropriate action.
Media Defence represented Mr Conrad before the UNWGAD and its Legal Director Pádraig Hughes, in welcoming the findings, noted that “Tsi Conrad’s case demonstrates how far the Cameroon authorities are willing to go to silence dissent. The Working Group’s findings are clear – he is being held unlawfully by the government and should be released immediately.”
Read the UNWGAD Opinion here.
To read more about Media Defence’s work in cases involving Cameroon, go to:
If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here.
If you would like to help us support journalists through donating funds or pro-bono work, please click here.
Network Coordinator: role summary Media Defence is looking for a highly motivated individual to join the team as a Coordinator for the Legal Network for Journalists at Risk (LNJAR). Media Defence is a Steering Committee Member of the LNJAR. In this role, you will oversee the day-to-day operations of the LNJAR, which provides legal support […]
On Thursday July 21st, 11am BST, we’re hosting a webinar to explore the impact of conflict on freedom of expression. We’ll hear from those directly involved about the violence journalists experience, and the longer-term implications of war on press freedoms. Register here. The Context War reporting by independent journalists is essential to ensuring the public […]
About the survey In 2021, we carried out our second Lawyer Impact Survey to assess the impact of our support to lawyers. We support lawyers with both our emergency defence and our strategic litigation programmes. Through these programmes, we offer pro bono legal support, as well as financial support for lawyers in order to cover […]