Landmark Ruling: Kenya’s High Court Declares Colonial-era Subversion Laws Unconstitutional

Landmark Ruling: Kenya’s High Court Declares Colonial-era Subversion Laws Unconstitutional

Media Defence welcomes the verdict of the High Court in Nakuru, striking down sections of the Kenyan Penal Code which criminalise subversion, citing them as relics of colonial oppression that curtail freedom of expression.

Justice Samwel Mohochi, delivering the judgment, asserted that these provisions were overly broad and vague, stifling dissent rather than serving any legitimate purpose. He emphasised that they violate the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the Kenyan Constitution.

The offence of subversion was introduced in Kenya during the state-of-emergency in the 1960’s, to stifle dissent against the British Colonial Government. Subversion charges have since been employed by authorities to target individuals expressing dissenting political views or engaging in activities perceived as challenging the government’s authority. These charges were punishable by up to seven years imprisonment.

The legal petition was brought by a coalition of human rights activists and professional bodies, including the Katiba Institute, Law Society of Kenya, Kenya Union of Journalists, and Kenya Human Rights Commission, among others. They argued that the subversion laws unjustly penalise political dissent, a fundamental aspect of democracy.

The case was prompted by the arrest of Joshua Otieno Ayika, a Kenyan lawyer, who faced charges of subversive activities after a tweet on 16th July 2022 in which he predicted a government takeover by the military.

Cases like that of Ayika, highlight the arbitrary application of these laws to quell dissenting voices. Justice Mohochi’s ruling deems sections 77(1) and (3) of the Penal Code unconstitutional. Additionally, but also underscores the importance of safeguarding freedom of expression in a modern, democratic society.

“One beautiful thing about oppressive regimes…” Ochiel J Dudley, one of the lawyers representing the coalition, told Media Defence, “is that we can get great decisions if the courts are brave and litigants seize the moment. Some of the most frequently cited constitutional decisions in both Uganda and Kenya have come from attempts by the state to oppress citizens”.

This decision marks a significant step towards upholding democratic values and dismantling oppressive remnants of colonial rule. Media Defence is proud to have provided both legal and financial support in this case.

If you face legal threats because of your journalism, we can help.

Recent News

Call for Proposals: Grants for Litigation Surgeries

  Apply here Inscreva-se aqui Aplicar aquí Appliquer ici   Call for Proposals: Grants for Litigation Surgeries Summary Media Defence is offering one-off project grants to lawyers who have participated in any of our litigation surgeries since 2018. The grants are intended to facilitate the organisation of litigation surgeries in their respective countries of practice. […]


Spotlight on Hungary: Fighting Back against Pegasus, a Tool of Transnational Oppression

Media freedom in Hungary has significantly declined since the Fidesz party led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán came to power. The government exerts substantial control over the media landscape. The national public media company, MTVA has been effectively turned into a government-controlled broadcaster, while the 2018 establishment of the Central European Press and Media Foundation […]


Kenyan Court Declares Journalist Arshad Sharif’s Killing Unlawful

July 8, 2024– In a critical ruling, the High Court of Kenya at Kajiado, has found the killing of prominent Pakistani journalist, Arshad Sharif, unlawful. The Court also condemned the authorities’ failure to carry out a prompt and independent investigation into the killing. Judge Mutuku stated that the authorities played a “blame game” in the […]