On 22 September 2020, Media Defence filed an amicus curiae brief before Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice, in a case challenging the constitutionality of the country’s national Law on the Use of Force. The brief, filed together with Article 19 (Office for Mexico and Central America), examines international legal standards governing the use of force, in light of a state’s obligations to safeguard freedom of expression, the free press and the right to protest.
Adopted in May 2019, the law grants Mexico’s security forces broad discretion to use force, including in the context of non-violent demonstrations and gatherings. It fails to provide any specific protections to journalists or other third parties who might be present at such events in order to report on them. In June 2019, Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission filed a constitutional challenge to the law, arguing that it violated various protected rights, including freedom of expression and the right to protest.
The brief sets out international and comparative legal standards relevant to the regulation of force, in light of a state’s obligation to safeguard the right to protest and the media’s right to report on it. In particular, the brief examines the following points:
- The current legal framework, which justifies the use of force through the need to maintain social control, should be replaced by one premised on the protection of human rights, including the rights to protest and report.
- Through the use of broad and overly vague terms, the law grants authorities a wide discretion to determine when force is legitimate. This may result in the use of force in circumstances that violate free expression and peaceful assembly rights.
- Journalists reporting at protests perform a vital role as “public watchdog”, gathering and disseminating information including about the conduct of authorities in the event of disorder. Special protections must be afforded to safeguard their ability to observe and report on such events. Any restriction that impacts on the media’s ability to carry out its role as “public watchdog” must be subject to strict scrutiny.
- Harassment, intimidation, violence, arrest and detention have a chilling effect on the media’s ability to cover protests and demonstrations. The failure of the law to protect the right of freedom of expression is particularly concerning in the context of the widespread violence perpetrated against journalists in Mexico.
Mexico is one of the deadliest countries in the world for journalists and reports of police abuse, impunity and corruption are common. Protests and public demonstrations are particularly dangerous, with journalists subject to assault, arrest and detention. It is hoped that this case will be an opportunity for the Supreme Court to strengthen the protections afforded to journalists in the face of that violence.
The amicus brief (Spanish) can be found here.
As part of our Digital Rights Advocates Project, Media Defence announces its new Summary Modules on Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression Online developed in collaboration with ALT Advisory. These modules provide an overview of relevant principles and case law for lawyers in sub-Saharan Africa interested in litigating digital rights cases. The modules are a […]
Welcome to the Digital Rights Advocates Blog Series, where we hear from lawyers litigating digital rights in sub-Saharan Africa. Digital rights have become indispensable for people around the world to exercise and enjoy their fundamental rights. Independent media is increasingly moving online – from established newspapers and television channels to bloggers and human rights activists […]
2020 has been an extraordinary year, with the world facing unprecedented challenges due to COVID-19. People moved their lives almost entirely online, even as they took to the streets to protest in staggering numbers. We have seen a rise in the number of governments clamping down on freedom of speech, ostensibly to protect citizens from […]