CLOSE

“No Case To Answer” for Gambian Journalists

“No Case To Answer” for Gambian Journalists

The Banjul Magistrates Court acquitted and discharged Sainey Mk Marenah, a freelance journalist, and Musa S. Sheriff, editor-in-chief of The Voice newspaper of charges of conspiracy to commit a felony and publication of false news. The defendants had pleaded not guilty to both charges and could have faced sentences of up to two years for each separate charge, in addition to a fine, if found guilty.

The charges were in relation to an article published in The Voice, a privately owned Gambian newspaper, on 9 December 2013. The article concerned the defection of 19 youth supporters of the ruling Alliance for Patriotic Re-Orientation and Construction to the opposition United Democracy Party. A rejoinder was written and published shortly after the APRC contested the story.

With financial support of the Media Legal Defence Initiative, the defence made a “no case to answer” submission at the close of the prosecution case. Gambian law allows defendants to argue that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons.  A ruling for “no case to answer” allows the case to end immediately.

Magistrate Jacqueline Nixon Hakim held that, although it was indisputable that a publication was made, the evidence presented was “neither direct or circumstantial” in showing the publication was false or that there had been a conspiracy between the journalists. Concluding that the prosecution had failed to prove its case, the prosecution of Marenah and Sheriff could not continue.

Recent News

Join us at RightsCon 2025

We are excited to be part of RightsCon 2025, taking place 24-27 February in Taipei and online. This year, we are hosting and participating in several sessions that explore surveillance, digital rights, and freedom of expression, alongside experts from across the globe. Our Sessions at RightsCon Taking Spyware to Court: Challenges and Opportunities of Spyware […]

Read

The Impact of Our Litigation Surgeries: A Conversation with Lawyer, Jorge Ruiz Del Ángel

Last year, we interviewed Mexican human rights lawyer Jorge Ruiz del Ángel about his experience attending one of our Litigation Surgeries and becoming part of our global network of lawyers. Our Litigation Surgeries Our litigation surgeries are a core component of Media Defence’s global work, offered both in-person and online. These are focused seminars where […]

Read

Filing Amicus Curiae and other submissions at Domestic Courts: Strengthening Freedom of Expression at the National Level

In 2024, Media Defence filed written submissions in a number of cases before domestic courts across four regions. The role of Media Defence took different forms, including that of third-party intervener, amicus curiae, and expert providing an opinion in international law. The purpose of the submissions is to assist each court in its determination of […]

Read