
Introduction
- An obligation on States to progressively promote access to the internet is emerging under international law, in recognition of the fact that access to the internet enables freedom of expression and a variety of other fundamental rights.
- Practices such as internet shutdowns and blocking and filtering of content are severe restrictions on the right to freedom of expression which often do not constitute justifiable limitations.
- National security is frequently relied upon as the justification for an interference with access to the internet, as well as other interferences with the right to freedom of expression. While national security is listed as one of the legitimate aims for restrictions on the right to freedom of expression in appropriate circumstances, it is often used by states to quell dissent and cover up state abuses.
- ‘Net neutrality’ refers to the principle that all internet data should be treated equally without discrimination based on the device, content, author, origin and/or destination of the content, service or application.
- Intermediary liability occurs where technological intermediaries, such as internet service providers (ISPs) and websites, may be held legally liable for unlawful or harmful content created by users of those services. Such liability has a chilling effect on freedom of expression online.
In this module
- Introduction
- Is there a Right to the Internet under International Law?
- Interferences with Access to the Internet
- What is an Internet Shutdown?
- What is the Blocking and Filtering of Content?
- What is Network Neutrality?
- Limitation of the Right to Freedom of Expression
- Intermediary Liability
- Conclusion
Access full module
Disclaimer: This publication is provided for information and research purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, Media Defence accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this material. Readers are encouraged to seek independent legal advice before acting on any of the information contained in this publication.