CLOSE

UK violated journalist’s free speech rights by arresting, charging her under Protection from Harassment Act

UK violated journalist’s free speech rights by arresting, charging her under Protection from Harassment Act

The ECtHR has found that the UK violated the right to freedom of expression of a journalist when she was arrested and prosecuted. Rita Pal was charged under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, after she published a news article online and posted several Tweets about an individual who subsequently complained to the police. She was arrested, handcuffed, and brought from Birmingham to a police station in London where she was detained before being released on bail. Criminal proceedings were initiated and subsequently discontinued. Her claim against the police for breach of her article 10 rights was dismissed by the domestic courts.

The ECtHR found that it had not been established that the arresting officer, the officer responsible for deciding to charge Ms Pal, or the domestic courts properly balanced her right to freedom of expression with the complainant’s right to respect for his private life and reputation or the need to prevent disorder or crime. On that basis it found a violation of article 10.

Media Defence intervened in the case as a third party, emphasising that imposing criminal sanctions on speech has serious implications for the media’s ability to carry out its role as a public watchdog. The intervention focused on the nature of journalistic activity, the use of criminal laws in that context, and the protections from criminal sanction that journalists should be afforded for doing their job. The intervention also highlighted the tendency in some states in the Council of Europe region towards criminalising basic acts of journalism, and the effect this is having on the ability of the press to report freely. In particular, it noted that laws designed to deal with a particular type of wrongdoing should not be misapplied in a way that criminalises legitimate journalistic activity.

The Court’s finding is a welcome reaffirmation of the importance of ensuring state interference with article 10 rights must be relevant and sufficient to the means sought to be achieved. The imposition of criminal sanctions on a person exercising their right to freedom of expression should only be lawful in “exceptional circumstances”, such as where other fundamental rights have been seriously impaired.

Welcoming the judgment, Media Defence’s Legal Director Pádraig Hughes said, “Journalists should be allowed to operate without interference from over-zealous state authorities. When law enforcement agencies are called on to assess journalistic activity, they must factor into that assessment the vital role journalists play as public watchdogs.”

 

See the Media Defence intervention here.

See the Judgment here.

If you are a journalist or citizen journalist in need of support, please click here.

Recent News

Meet the Team: Marta Cabrera

We’re thrilled to welcome Marta Cabrera, an accomplished human rights lawyer, to our team as a legal consultant. With years of experience at both the Inter-American and European Courts of Human Rights, Marta brings invaluable insight to our work. In this Meet the Team interview, she shares her journey, the cases that shaped her, and […]

Read

Our Journalist Impact Survey 2024

Explore Report We’re pleased to publish key insights from our 8th Journalist Impact Survey. The report shares findings and observations on the effectiveness and long-term impact of our legal and financial help, as well as the threats and trends affecting the journalists we support around the world. “The support I received from Media Defence has […]

Read

Standing Up to Abusive Lawsuits: Legal Support Seminar with Ossigeno per L’Informazione

9 April 2025 | 15:00–18:00 CET | In-person and online | Italian (In person & Online) English (Online) Media Defence’s CEO, Carlos Gaio, will join Italian press freedom partner Ossigeno per L’Informazione in addressing SLAPPs and the urgent need for high quality legal support.  On 9 April 2025, we will participate in the seminar “Intimidatory […]

Read