CLOSE

Open justice victory in Ugandan case

Open justice victory in Ugandan case

On 20 October 2014, the High Court of Uganda ordered that the trial of Ronald Poteri, a police detective accused of leaking secret audio recordings between the Ugandan Inspector General of Police and youths from the ruling National Resistance Movement Party, should be open to journalists and the public.

The High Court quashed an earlier decision by the Chief Magistrate and held that she had acted unreasonably and unfairly in banning all press and public. The Court was particularly critical of the fact that there had been no informed and balanced assessment as to whether the trial should proceed with the public and press excluded, and no consideration had been given to the dangers involved in holding hearings behind closed doors and out of public view. The case has been referred back to the lower courts with the instruction that freedom of expression is to be given appropriate weight in all decisions going forward.

The judgment sets a high standard for open justice in the Ugandan courts and represents a positive move against arbitrary blanket bans on media access to criminal trials. It is of utmost importance that journalists be allowed to attend court hearings, as they are the eyes and ears of the general public who are not able to attend.

Catherine Anite, who represented the Uganda Court Reporters Association, welcomed the outcome as a landmark ruling:

“The High Court has re-emphasised the importance of the media as a watchdog of justice and recognised their vital significance in ensuring that the principle of open justice is observed. The judiciary is obliged to ensure that journalists report court cases to enhance public knowledge and secure their confidence in court processes.”

Recent News

Kenyan Court Declares Journalist Arshad Sharif’s Killing Unlawful

July 8, 2024– In a critical ruling, the High Court of Kenya at Kajiado, has found the killing of prominent Pakistani journalist, Arshad Sharif, unlawful. The Court also condemned the authorities’ failure to carry out a prompt and independent investigation into the killing. Judge Mutuku stated that the authorities played a “blame game” in the […]

Read

Landmark Ruling in Uruguay: Court Dismisses $450k SLAPP Suit Against La Diaria

Leer en español By Edison Lanza and Matías Jackson A recent first instance ruling by a Civil Court in Montevideo (Uruguay) dismissed a damages lawsuit with characteristics of a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) filed against the print and digital media outlet La Diaria. After a civil process that took two years, the landmark […]

Read

Una sentencia ofrece argumentos para desestimar acciones SLAPP en Uruguay

Read in English Por Edison Lanza y Matías Jackson Una reciente sentencia de primera instancia dictada por un Juzgado Letrado en lo Civil de Montevideo (Uruguay) desestimó una demanda de daños y perjuicios con características de un litigio estratégico contra la participación pública (SLAPP por su sigla en inglés) interpuesta contra el medio escrito y […]

Read