CLOSE

Media Defence Raises Press Freedom Concerns Over Spyware at Brazil’s Supreme Court Hearing

Media Defence Raises Press Freedom Concerns Over Spyware at Brazil’s Supreme Court Hearing

At a recent public hearing held by the Federal Supreme Court (STF), Media Defence and partners ABRAJI and Tornavoz highlighted the significant risks posed by authorities’ use of secret surveillance tools on personal communication devices. The hearing sought to hear civil society and the academy on the implications of spyware tools and how to mitigate potential rights violations.

Speaking for Media Defence, Tornavoz and ABRAJI, Charlene Nagae, director and founder of Tornavoz, drew on examples from Mexico, El Salvador, and Azerbaijan where Pegasus has been used to persecute critical voices. Nagae warned, “If these software tools are authorised in Brazil, we risk compromising freedom of expression and journalistic activity.” In addition, spyware undermines journalists’ ability to protect sources, an essential aspect of investigative reporting and press freedom.

Media Defence urged the STF to consider these implications. Our stance aligns with broader concerns voiced during the hearing, where various experts and representatives highlighted the need for careful oversight and legislative evolution to protect independent journalism and democratic rights in the digital age. Estela Aranha, from the UN High-Level Advisory Council on Artificial Intelligence, cautioned against indiscriminate spyware access by authorities, citing “immense and irreversible risks” associated with such untraceable and uncontrollable tools.

Spyware’s misuse as a tool of transnational oppression against journalists worldwide was a key point. It instils fear, silences dissent, and erodes trust in digital communication platforms, fundamentally undermining freedom of expression. The call from civil society was clear: governments must endeavour to establish regulations that align with international human rights standards on surveillance technologies.

As the STF continues its deliberations, we remain dedicated to the protection of independent critical voices and the promotion of free speech in the digital age.

*This hearing was initiated by Justice Cristiano Zanin and is a part of the Claim of Non-Compliance with a Fundamental Precept (ADPF) 1143.

Interested in this topic?

For further insights into this critical issue, explore our free resources on the right to Privacy, Security and Data Protection, on our Resource Hub. Media Defence have been at the forefront of litigating against State targeting of journalists with Pegasus spyware, see here and here.

Recent News

Join us at RightsCon 2025

We are excited to be part of RightsCon 2025, taking place 24-27 February in Taipei and online. This year, we are hosting and participating in several sessions that explore surveillance, digital rights, and freedom of expression, alongside experts from across the globe. Our Sessions at RightsCon Taking Spyware to Court: Challenges and Opportunities of Spyware […]

Read

The Impact of Our Litigation Surgeries: A Conversation with Lawyer, Jorge Ruiz Del Ángel

Last year, we interviewed Mexican human rights lawyer Jorge Ruiz del Ángel about his experience attending one of our Litigation Surgeries and becoming part of our global network of lawyers. Our Litigation Surgeries Our litigation surgeries are a core component of Media Defence’s global work, offered both in-person and online. These are focused seminars where […]

Read

Filing Amicus Curiae and other submissions at Domestic Courts: Strengthening Freedom of Expression at the National Level

In 2024, Media Defence filed written submissions in a number of cases before domestic courts across four regions. The role of Media Defence took different forms, including that of third-party intervener, amicus curiae, and expert providing an opinion in international law. The purpose of the submissions is to assist each court in its determination of […]

Read