Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

The European Court of Human Rights has held that Turkey violated the Article 5(1) and 10 rights of journalist Murat Aksoy. Mr Aksoy was arrested and detained in the government crackdown following the July 2016 attempted coup. Media Defence intervened as a third party in the case, along with 12 other freedom of expression organisations.

Mr Aksoy, a prominent columnist known for his critical views of the Turkish government, was taken into custody just a few weeks after the attempted coup. He was accused of membership of a terrorist organisation, amongst other charges – with authorities basing those charges on opinion columns he had written that were critical of the government. Mr Aksoy was held in custody from his arrest until October 2017, before being rearrested in November 2018, and ultimately released in January 2019.

In its judgment, the Court found that there had been no plausible grounds to suspect Mr Aksoy of committing any criminal offence with the result that his lengthy detention violated his rights pursuant to Article 5(1). Having found his detention to be unlawful, the Court also held that authorities had violated his right to freedom of expression.

The interveners had urged the Court to closely scrutinise the circumstances in which journalists critical of the state are targeted because of their criticism, particularly where there is an emerging pattern of human rights restrictions. However, once again, the Court found no violation of Article 18, despite Mr Aksoy’s contention that Turkish authorities had clearly pursued an ulterior purpose in detaining him, namely to punish and silence his reporting. In light of its earlier findings, the Court considered that it was not necessary to consider this complaint separately.

Media Defence filed the intervention along with PEN International, ARTICLE 19, the Association of European Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, the European Federation of Journalists, Human Rights Watch, Index on Censorship, the International Federation of Journalists, the International Press Institute, the International Senior Lawyers Project and Reporters without Borders.

If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here

If you would like to support our work, please click here.

Recent News

The “Misuse” of the judicial system to attack freedom of expression

UNESCO has released a new report on “The “misuse” of the judicial system to attack freedom of expression”. The report takes an in-depth look at the patterns and challenges surrounding the rise of abusive litigation, and makes a number of recommendations. To mark its release, we explore our own experience tackling legal threats to freedom […]

Read

Russian disinformation: a weapon in its war on Ukraine

Lawmakers, academics and citizens are becoming increasingly aware of the threat posed by disinformation and malinformation. ‘Disinformation’ refers to falsehoods spread deliberately to stoke distrust or promote an agenda. It is a widespread issue, overshadowing elections everywhere from Brazil to the USA, fuelling hate speech, such as in India, and impacting stock prices around the […]

Read

TOHAV & The Fight for Freedom of Expression in Turkey – by Esma Yasar

This article was written by Esma Yasar, a Kurdish lawyer working for Media Defence’s partner organisation TOHAV. Esma Yasar took part in Media Defence’s fellowship programme, which hosts human rights lawyers from our funded partner organisations all over the world. Freedom of Expression and Press Freedom in Turkey Turkey is one of the most restrictive […]

Read