Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

The European Court of Human Rights has held that Turkey violated the Article 5(1) and 10 rights of journalist Murat Aksoy. Mr Aksoy was arrested and detained in the government crackdown following the July 2016 attempted coup. Media Defence intervened as a third party in the case, along with 12 other freedom of expression organisations.

Mr Aksoy, a prominent columnist known for his critical views of the Turkish government, was taken into custody just a few weeks after the attempted coup. He was accused of membership of a terrorist organisation, amongst other charges – with authorities basing those charges on opinion columns he had written that were critical of the government. Mr Aksoy was held in custody from his arrest until October 2017, before being rearrested in November 2018, and ultimately released in January 2019.

In its judgment, the Court found that there had been no plausible grounds to suspect Mr Aksoy of committing any criminal offence with the result that his lengthy detention violated his rights pursuant to Article 5(1). Having found his detention to be unlawful, the Court also held that authorities had violated his right to freedom of expression.

The interveners had urged the Court to closely scrutinise the circumstances in which journalists critical of the state are targeted because of their criticism, particularly where there is an emerging pattern of human rights restrictions. However, once again, the Court found no violation of Article 18, despite Mr Aksoy’s contention that Turkish authorities had clearly pursued an ulterior purpose in detaining him, namely to punish and silence his reporting. In light of its earlier findings, the Court considered that it was not necessary to consider this complaint separately.

Media Defence filed the intervention along with PEN International, ARTICLE 19, the Association of European Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, the European Federation of Journalists, Human Rights Watch, Index on Censorship, the International Federation of Journalists, the International Press Institute, the International Senior Lawyers Project and Reporters without Borders.

If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here

If you would like to support our work, please click here.

Recent News

ECtHR finds Russian regulator unlawfully issued warnings against newspaper reporting on extremist organisations

The European Court of Human Rights has handed down judgment today in the case of Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v Russia.

Read

World Press Freedom Day 2021: Media Defence Reflects on Current Trends Threatening Media Freedom

The last 12 months have brought into sharp focus the extent to which media freedom is under threat. At Media Defence we see these challenges on a daily basis. In the last year, we have seen them accelerate due to the pandemic, with unscrupulous regimes introducing oppressive legal measures under the guise of tackling disinformation, […]

Read

Call for Consultants: Trainer at Litigation Surgery on Digital Rights Freedom of Expression Online (French-Speaking)

Purpose of the consultancy contract The purpose of the consultancy contract is for a French-speaking trainer to create recorded presentations and host discussions sessions for lawyers in West and Central Africa on digital rights and freedom of expression online. Background Media Defence’s vision is a world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten […]

Read