Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

European Court Finds Turkey Violated the Rights to Liberty and Security and Freedom of Expression of Journalist Murat Aksoy, Detained in the Crackdown Following the July 2016 Attempted Coup

The European Court of Human Rights has held that Turkey violated the Article 5(1) and 10 rights of journalist Murat Aksoy. Mr Aksoy was arrested and detained in the government crackdown following the July 2016 attempted coup. Media Defence intervened as a third party in the case, along with 12 other freedom of expression organisations.

Mr Aksoy, a prominent columnist known for his critical views of the Turkish government, was taken into custody just a few weeks after the attempted coup. He was accused of membership of a terrorist organisation, amongst other charges – with authorities basing those charges on opinion columns he had written that were critical of the government. Mr Aksoy was held in custody from his arrest until October 2017, before being rearrested in November 2018, and ultimately released in January 2019.

In its judgment, the Court found that there had been no plausible grounds to suspect Mr Aksoy of committing any criminal offence with the result that his lengthy detention violated his rights pursuant to Article 5(1). Having found his detention to be unlawful, the Court also held that authorities had violated his right to freedom of expression.

The interveners had urged the Court to closely scrutinise the circumstances in which journalists critical of the state are targeted because of their criticism, particularly where there is an emerging pattern of human rights restrictions. However, once again, the Court found no violation of Article 18, despite Mr Aksoy’s contention that Turkish authorities had clearly pursued an ulterior purpose in detaining him, namely to punish and silence his reporting. In light of its earlier findings, the Court considered that it was not necessary to consider this complaint separately.

Media Defence filed the intervention along with PEN International, ARTICLE 19, the Association of European Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, the European Federation of Journalists, Human Rights Watch, Index on Censorship, the International Federation of Journalists, the International Press Institute, the International Senior Lawyers Project and Reporters without Borders.

If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here

If you would like to support our work, please click here.

Recent News

Galina Arapova: media lawyer, human rights defender, “foreign agent”

“If you do your work well, if you are a professional and a decent person – that is what will remain in the end.” Galina Arapova interviewed in 2021 by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Galina Arapova is the director and senior media lawyer of the NGO Mass Media Defence Centre. Beyond this, she is an […]

Read

The crisis of the twenty-six words that founded the internet

By Lucas Anastácio Mourão, partner at Flora, Matheus & Mangabeira Sociedade de Advogados. The legal solutions devised to combat problems, as they arise with each new period and context, often seem definitive at the time of their conception. Yet as technologies and behaviours evolve over time, so must our legal responses change and adapt. The […]

Read

Join the team! We’re hiring for a Project Assistant.

We’re hiring for a Project Assistant to join our Empowering Women in Digital Rights Advocacy project. The project develops legal communities, in particular women lawyers, to defend, promote and strengthen freedom of expression online. For example, under this project, Media Defence: (i) conducts litigation surgeries for lawyers in sub-Saharan Africa on litigating digital rights cases […]

Read