Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

World Press Freedom Day 2021: Watch Media Defence’s Webinar on SLAPPs

World Press Freedom Day 2021: Watch Media Defence’s Webinar on SLAPPs

On the 4th May 2021, Media Defence hosted a free webinar to discuss the use of abusive litigation to silence journalists around the world. The webinar featured as part of UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Day and you can watch it, in full, above.

In Brazil, journalist and author João Paulo Cuenca became the defendant in more than 140 lawsuits. Pastors from the Universal Church of the Kingdom of Christ, a huge multinational organisation, filed these suits all over the country. In Poland, Media Defence is providing emergency support to Grzegorz Rzeczkowski, an investigative journalist with the prominent political weekly Polityka. Rzeczkowski is facing multiple lawsuits for his reporting on the “wiretapping scandal”, which rocked Polish politics in 2014.

These are examples of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation – otherwise known as “gag lawsuits”. SLAPP lawsuits are used to censor and intimidate critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defence until they abandon their opposition. These suits are not only aimed at media outlets, but individual journalists, who have been targeted in their personal capacity. Many of these journalists face heavy fines, bans from journalism, and even custodial sentences as a result of baseless legal claims. This type of litigation is designed to drain resources and chill critical reporting, and is becoming increasingly common across Europe and around the world.

The Webinar

Media Defence, as part of the Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe, is committed to defending and protecting journalists from this kind of persecution. This event aimed to raise awareness of this form of censorship, and share expertise on how best to counter it. Our panellists have a wealth of experience of SLAPPs, both personally and professionally, and discussed how this type of litigation has been used in their region.

Panellists

  • Pedro Vaca Villarreal, Colombian lawyer and Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
  • João Paulo Cuenca, Brazilian writer and journalist
  • Ana Bejarano, Co-director of Colombian NGO, El Veinte, and law professor at Los Andes University
  • Emmanuel Vargas, Co-director of El Veinte and Legal and Grants Officer at Media Defence
  • Joanna Connolly, Legal Officer at Media Defence and liaison with the Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe

 

El Veinte is an NGO dedicated to studying and countering legal harassment against journalists, media outlets and social media users in Colombia. El Veinte provides support through its pro bono network, strategic litigation, and capacity building. In 2021, El Veinte has been working on drafting policy and legislative proposals to adopt legal safeguards against SLAPPs in Colombia. (https://www.elveinte.org/, or follow on Twitter @elveinteorg).  

 

Recent News

Kelly Duda: Bad Blood

Kelly Duda originally wrote this piece for Index on Censorship. Kelly Duda is an activist and producer and director of the documentary “Factor 8: The Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal”. Duda travelled to Italy to offer his services as a prosecution witness in a trial about blood contamination. As a result, he now faces charges himself. […]

Read

UK violated journalist’s free speech rights by arresting, charging her under Protection from Harassment Act

The ECtHR has found that the UK violated the right to freedom of expression of a journalist when she was arrested and prosecuted. Rita Pal was charged under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, after she published a news article online and posted several Tweets about an individual who subsequently complained to the police. She […]

Read

Strasbourg court’s right to be forgotten decision will impact public interest reporting

In a worrying expansion of the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) has decided that a journalist may be held liable for failing or refusing to de-index information published on the Internet. In Biancardi v Italy the applicant, an editor of a newspaper, complained that he […]

Read