Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

Media Defence Supports Argentinian Investigative Reporter Threatened for Public Interest Newsgathering

Media Defence Supports Argentinian Investigative Reporter Threatened for Public Interest Newsgathering

Santiago O’Donnell is an Argentinian investigative journalist, author and editor of international news at newspaper Página 12. In October 2020 O’Donnell published a controversial book (“Hermano”) detailing the rise of Mauricio Macri to the presidency. The book was based on research and recorded interviews with the former president’s brother, Mariano.

The reaction from the Macri family was swift. Mariano Macri applied to the courts asking for the tapes of his interviews with O’Donnell to be turned over in order to prepare a civil lawsuit for damages against him. The first instance judge granted the request and gave O’Donnell five days to comply.

Media Defence is supporting O’Donnell’s defence in court, where he is appealing this ruling. According to his lawyers, Damián Loretti and Cristian del Rosario, “the decision to publish or to reveal the content of an interview remains with the journalist, not the interviewee”. If the first instance court order is not overturned, it may create a dangerous precedent impacting on press freedom on the continent. O’Donnell’s reporting relates to matters that are clearly in the public interest. International law recognises that the techniques and methods of reporting are matters for journalists to determine. In that respect, international courts have noted that journalists enjoy freedom to choose how they report on news items and have recognised the importance of protecting journalists’ newsgathering activities, conducted prior to publication. Santiago O’Donnell’s case puts these fundamental principles of journalism at risk.

Latest Update

With our support, Santiago O’Donnell’s legal team have been mounting a series of appeals and challenges to the ruling. Despite this, on 7 December 2021 the 6th civil court of Buenos Aires upheld the order for O’Donnell to hand over copies of his recordings.

Once notified of the 7 December order, O’Donnell’s team filed a brief questioning the order because it generated confusion and lacked legal basis. The judge rejected this brief. Following this, O’Donnell’s lawyers filed an appeal to the High Court to nullify the order. It was denied.

Finally, they attempted a rare appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision that denied the appeal (Recurso de Queja por Denegación de Recurso de Apelación). On 17 February 2022, the Supreme Court admitted this appeal and suspended the first instance court order of 7 December. The case will now be considered by the Supreme Court and we hope the Court will adopt a positive decision.

Reaction to this story in Argentina has been very positive and widespread. All the main newspapers reported on the decision.  We filed an application alongside O’Donnell’s lawyers to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in November 2021. The petition is under consideration.

The story has been widely covered in the Argentinian press, including Perfil, El Cohete a la Luna and O’Donnell’s paper, Pagina12.

 

If you are a journalist or lawyer in need of support, please click here.

If you would like to support our work, please click here.

Recent News

Freedom of expression in Poland: legal harassment against journalists and widening political control over the media

Welcome to the latest instalment of our Partners blog series. In this series, we interview our partners from around the world about their critical work in protecting freedom of expression. This time our communications assistant Julie Reintjes spoke to Konrad Siemaszko, who works as a lawyer for the Poland-based Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (HFHR). […]

Read

Call for Consultants: Independent Evaluation of ‘Empowering Women in Digital Rights Advocacy’ project

The consultancy We are looking to engage an experienced evaluation consultant to carry out an interim and final evaluation of one of our projects. The project, called Empowering Women in Digital Rights Advocacy (EWDRA), is based in sub-Saharan Africa and began late last year. In addition, the consultant will conduct independent research with an intersectional […]

Read

Spying in the digital age: The use of spyware against journalists

Spyware and freedom of expression Encryption is a valuable tool for freedom of expression online. It allows journalists, lawyers, human rights activists, and citizens to communicate securely. In recent years however, journalists around the world have experienced increasing digital surveillance, despite encryption becoming more accessible. In particular, investigative journalists uncovering corruption, abuse of power, and […]

Read