CLOSE

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

News website blocked for “subjective” reporting

News website blocked for “subjective” reporting

In the former Soviet republics of Central Asia, as elsewhere in the world, people increasingly look to the internet for information. So web-users in Kyrgyzstan were dismayed when the Russian-language news website fergana.ru, which is based in Moscow but has a large following in the region, was blocked.

A court case challenging the move is now in progress in the Kyrgyz capital, Bishkek, and MLDI is providing financial support. A hearing in December ended with the judge requesting more information from the authorities, and the next hearing is due in mid-January.

The matter goes back to June 2010, when inter-ethnic violence, resulting in at least 400 deaths, broke out in the Osh region of Kyrgyzstan. A year later the Kyrgyz parliament adopted a resolution to block the fergana.ru website within the country on the grounds that it had published “subjective information” on the clashes.

The prime minister accepted the resolution and the website was blocked in February 2012. The legal validity of this action, however, is disputed, and indeed the country’s president stated it was “inappropriate”.

In November, the website’s lawyer, Nurbek Toktakunov, filed two petitions in a Bishkek court to challenge the blocking. The first, on behalf of the website itself, says that a media outlet may be banned only by a court order and not a parliamentary resolution, so the blocking of the site and a subsequent refusal to lift the blocking were illegal.

The second is in Mr Toktakunov’s own name and claims that his right as a citizen to access information was violated by the blocking.

The petitions also argue that under the law such action may be taken only if a court declares the information in question to be “extremist”, and that the prosecutor’s office should apply to the court to make a case accordingly.

MLDI’s Nani Jansen commented that the case was important to MLDI. She said that “this concerns not just the right of the website, as a news provider, to report the news, but the right of the Kyrgyz public to receive and read it. It is not up to the Kyrgyz parliament or the President to decide what websites the people can and cannot read. That’s censorship, and there is no place for that in a modern democracy.”

Recent News

Getting to Know: Chambers Diversity & Inclusion

In September 2019, Media Defence was announced as the charity partner of the Chambers and Partners Diversity and Inclusion Awards. The Chambers Diversity and Inclusion Awards aim to recognize and celebrate law firms’ pro-bono achievements and contributions to diversity within the legal profession. The partnership provides opportunities for fundraising and expansion of our pro bono […]

Read

African Commission finds Rwandan Authorities Violated Journalists’ Right to Freedom of Expression

The African Commission of Human and People’s Rights has found that Rwanda violated the right to freedom of expression of two journalists, Agnes Uwimana Nkusi and Saidati Mukakibi, after they were convicted and imprisoned on national security offences for publishing a series of articles criticising the Rwandan Government and President Paul Kagame. Ms Uwimana was […]

Read

Media Defence Launches eReader and Advanced Modules on Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression Online

Media Defence is excited to announce its new eReader which is now the home to the new Advanced Modules on Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression Online! The eReader has been developed as part of our Digital Rights Advocates Project (DRAP) which is funded by the US Department of Democracy, Rights and Labor and supports […]

Read