Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

News website blocked for “subjective” reporting

News website blocked for “subjective” reporting

In the former Soviet republics of Central Asia, as elsewhere in the world, people increasingly look to the internet for information. So web-users in Kyrgyzstan were dismayed when the Russian-language news website fergana.ru, which is based in Moscow but has a large following in the region, was blocked.

A court case challenging the move is now in progress in the Kyrgyz capital, Bishkek, and MLDI is providing financial support. A hearing in December ended with the judge requesting more information from the authorities, and the next hearing is due in mid-January.

The matter goes back to June 2010, when inter-ethnic violence, resulting in at least 400 deaths, broke out in the Osh region of Kyrgyzstan. A year later the Kyrgyz parliament adopted a resolution to block the fergana.ru website within the country on the grounds that it had published “subjective information” on the clashes.

The prime minister accepted the resolution and the website was blocked in February 2012. The legal validity of this action, however, is disputed, and indeed the country’s president stated it was “inappropriate”.

In November, the website’s lawyer, Nurbek Toktakunov, filed two petitions in a Bishkek court to challenge the blocking. The first, on behalf of the website itself, says that a media outlet may be banned only by a court order and not a parliamentary resolution, so the blocking of the site and a subsequent refusal to lift the blocking were illegal.

The second is in Mr Toktakunov’s own name and claims that his right as a citizen to access information was violated by the blocking.

The petitions also argue that under the law such action may be taken only if a court declares the information in question to be “extremist”, and that the prosecutor’s office should apply to the court to make a case accordingly.

MLDI’s Nani Jansen commented that the case was important to MLDI. She said that “this concerns not just the right of the website, as a news provider, to report the news, but the right of the Kyrgyz public to receive and read it. It is not up to the Kyrgyz parliament or the President to decide what websites the people can and cannot read. That’s censorship, and there is no place for that in a modern democracy.”

Recent News

Russian disinformation: a weapon in its war on Ukraine

Lawmakers, academics and citizens are becoming increasingly aware of the threat posed by disinformation and malinformation. ‘Disinformation’ refers to falsehoods spread deliberately to stoke distrust or promote an agenda. It is a widespread issue, overshadowing elections everywhere from Brazil to the USA, fuelling hate speech, such as in India, and impacting stock prices around the […]

Read

TOHAV & The Fight for Freedom of Expression in Turkey – by Esma Yasar

This article was written by Esma Yasar, a Kurdish lawyer working for Media Defence’s partner organisation TOHAV. Esma Yasar took part in Media Defence’s fellowship programme, which hosts human rights lawyers from our funded partner organisations all over the world. Freedom of Expression and Press Freedom in Turkey Turkey is one of the most restrictive […]

Read

[NOW CLOSED] We’re recruiting: Human Resources and Operations Manager

We are looking for a talented Human Resources and Operations Manager to coordinate our Human Resources, Information Technology and Office Management. About Media Defence Media Defence is a charity that helps media to defend their rights. We support independent media, journalists and citizen journalists who are under legal threat by making sure that lawyers are […]

Read