CLOSE

Media Defence intervenes before Colombian Constitutional Court in a challenge to the law on criminal defamation

Media Defence intervenes before Colombian Constitutional Court in a challenge to the law on criminal defamation

Media Defence has filed an intervention before the Constitutional Court of Colombia in a constitutional challenge to two provisions of the Colombian Penal Code. Under Articles 220 and 221 of the Penal Code, individuals accused of making “dishonourable accusations” can face up to four-and-a-half years in jail. Those accused of libel face up to six years in jail.[1] The constitutionality of these provisions was challenged by Colombian non-governmental organisation El Veinte.

The case raises important questions around the effect that criminal provisions, in particular those imposing custodial sentences, have on the exercise of freedom of expression.

Noting that the Constitutional Court had already decided on the question of proportionality with respect to these laws, the intervention focuses on the chilling effect of those provisions. It argues that criminal provisions on defamation are open for abuse and put journalists at risk of receiving custodial sentences for legitimate reporting on matters of public interest.

The intervention notes that criminal defamation laws are per se in contradiction with international human rights law, and constitute an unjustified interference with freedom of expression. It also emphasises that the prospect of receiving a custodial prison sentence for reporting means journalists often end up self-censoring.

The intervention argues that this chilling effect constitutes a form of prior restraint which is not permissible under the American Convention on Human Rights. Prior restraint amounts to an especially severe limitation of freedom of expression as it curtails speech even before it is placed before the public.

If you are a journalist in need of legal support, please click here.

 

[1] Penal Code of Colombia, last updated on 20 April 2023 (accessible here).

Recent News

Azerbaijan held liable for blocking Radio Free Europe’s websites by ECtHR

The case relates to the blocking of RFE’s websites in 2017, and was one of four separate cases involving website blocking that were considered by the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’). The websites were blocked with immediate effect, pending an application for a court order by the relevant government agency. According to the government, […]

Read

Media Defence Files Intervention at European Court to Protect Anonymity Online

Media Defence has filed a third-party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Koumiotis v Greece to protect anonymity online. The case concerns criminal proceedings against the applicant, the owner and manager of an online blog. The applicant, following a series of posts criticising a businessman, was convicted of slanderous defamation. The […]

Read

Call for Consultants: Independent evaluation of ‘International Network of Internet Freedom Lawyers (INIFL)’ multi-regional project

1. About Media Defence Media Defence’s Vision A world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public interest, allowing citizens to be better informed, able to hold those in power to account. Media Defence’s Mission  To ensure legal protection of journalists and media […]

Read