In 2020, we carried out our fourth annual Journalist Impact Survey to look at the longer-term impact of our support on our primary beneficiaries, journalists. Our Journalist Impact Survey is designed to understand the quality of our legal and financial support to journalists in addition to gaining a greater appreciation of the role of legal defence in ensuring journalists can continue to report, which informs Media Defence’s future casework. The survey allows us to test our theory of change: access to legal defence enables journalists to continue reporting and holding governments and authorities to account for the public.
While the ongoing pandemic meant that fewer cases progressed to judgment in 2020 than in previous years, changes in the way we obtain responses from journalists we have supported increased the response rate from 32% in 2019 to 54% in 2020. This means that the findings set out below are based on a similar number of responses than last year (21 responses compared to 22 last year).
Key findings include:
- 95% of respondents were satisfied with the outcome of their case
- 95% of respondents would recommend our support to other journalists facing legal action; and
- 90% of respondents were satisfied or extremely satisfied with the lawyer who handled their case.
The survey found that the support by Media Defence and its partners enabled over 90% of those who were the target of litigation to continue reporting on public interest issues. Another journalist expressed that without Media Defence’s support, “it would be more difficult for me to defend my rights.”
Read the full report here.
If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here.
Call for Consultants: Update of Training Materials on Freedom of Expression in South and Southeast Asia
Purpose of the consultancy contract This is a call for consultants to review and update eleven existing training modules on freedom of expression in South and Southeast Asia. Background Media Defence’s vision is a world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public […]
Media Defence et l’Impact Lab pour l’Etat de droit de Stanford Law School saisissent la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO contre les coupures d’internet ordonnées par l’Etat sénégalais
Le recours au nom d’AfricTivistes et de deux journalistes sénégalais vise à obtenir des mesures provisoires pour empêcher de nouvelles coupures d’Internet READ IN ENGLISH Dakar, le 13 février 2024 – Media Defence et le Rule of Law Impact Lab de la Stanford Law School ont déposé un recours devant la Cour de justice […]
Media Defence and SLS’s Rule of Law Impact Lab File Case Before ECOWAS Court Challenging Senegal Internet Shutdowns
Filing on behalf of AfricTivistes and Two Senegalese Journalists Seeks Interim Measures to Prevent Internet Shutdowns. READ IN FRENCH Dakar, February 13, 2024 – Media Defence and the Rule of Law Impact Lab at Stanford Law School have filed a lawsuit before the Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West […]