CLOSE

Journalist Impact Survey 2020

I haven’t changed a millimetre, I’m writing even more freely, and I’m even more convinced that I shouldn’t stop.” Journalist supported by Media Defence in 2020.

Journalist Impact Survey 2020

In 2020, we carried out our fourth annual Journalist Impact Survey to look at the longer-term impact of our support on our primary beneficiaries, journalists. Our Journalist Impact Survey is designed to understand the quality of our legal and financial support to journalists in addition to gaining a greater appreciation of the role of legal defence in ensuring journalists can continue to report, which informs Media Defence’s future casework. The survey allows us to test our theory of change: access to legal defence enables journalists to continue reporting and holding governments and authorities to account for the public.

While the ongoing pandemic meant that fewer cases progressed to judgment in 2020 than in previous years, changes in the way we obtain responses from journalists we have supported increased the response rate from 32% in 2019 to 54% in 2020. This means that the findings set out below are based on a similar number of responses than last year (21 responses compared to 22 last year).

Key findings include:

  • 95% of respondents were satisfied with the outcome of their case
  • 95% of respondents would recommend our support to other journalists facing legal action; and
  • 90% of respondents were satisfied or extremely satisfied with the lawyer who handled their case.

 

The survey found that the support by Media Defence and its partners enabled over 90% of those who were the target of litigation to continue reporting on public interest issues. Another journalist expressed that without Media Defence’s support, “it would be more difficult for me to defend my rights.”

Read the full report here.

If you are a journalist in need of support, please click here.

Recent News

Azerbaijan held liable for blocking Radio Free Europe’s websites by ECtHR

The case relates to the blocking of RFE’s websites in 2017, and was one of four separate cases involving website blocking that were considered by the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’). The websites were blocked with immediate effect, pending an application for a court order by the relevant government agency. According to the government, […]

Read

Media Defence Files Intervention at European Court to Protect Anonymity Online

Media Defence has filed a third-party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Koumiotis v Greece to protect anonymity online. The case concerns criminal proceedings against the applicant, the owner and manager of an online blog. The applicant, following a series of posts criticising a businessman, was convicted of slanderous defamation. The […]

Read

Call for Consultants: Independent evaluation of ‘International Network of Internet Freedom Lawyers (INIFL)’ multi-regional project

1. About Media Defence Media Defence’s Vision A world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public interest, allowing citizens to be better informed, able to hold those in power to account. Media Defence’s Mission  To ensure legal protection of journalists and media […]

Read