MLDI has filed an intervention in the case of Marcel Granier and others vs. Venezuela, before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, concerning the denial of a licence to Venezuelan broadcaster Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV) in 2007.
RCTV was one of Venezuela’s oldest stations and a frequent critic of former President Hugo Chávez’s government. Although the Venezuelan government offered various, often inconsistent, reasons for not renewing RCTV’s licence, an official media campaign and multiple statements by government officials strongly hinted that political differences between RCTV and the Venezuelan Government were behind the decision. Many international organisations, governments and non-profits criticised the actions of the Venezuelan government and the lack of transparency and due process during the decision-making process.
The case raises the key issue of political interference in broadcast licensing and is the first time the Inter-American Court will rule on this question. Radio and television are an essential source of news and information for millions of people, and ensuring a fair allocation of broadcasting licences is crucial to the proper functioning of democracy.
MLDI’s intervention focuses on the implications of the non-renewal of RCTV’s license for freedom of expression in the country. It explores examples of broadcasting regulations from around that world that give proper deference to the principles of transparency and due process in licensing proceedings. It further discusses precedent from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the importance of media pluralism in a democratic society.
MLDI’s intervention follows an earlier application to the Court by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The Commission concluded that Venezuela’s actions violated RCTV’s rights to freedom of expression and due process, and asks the Court to rule on the matter. An oral hearing in this case is scheduled to take place at the end of May.
Call for Consultants: Update of Training Materials on Freedom of Expression in South and Southeast Asia
Purpose of the consultancy contract This is a call for consultants to review and update eleven existing training modules on freedom of expression in South and Southeast Asia. Background Media Defence’s vision is a world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public […]
Media Defence et l’Impact Lab pour l’Etat de droit de Stanford Law School saisissent la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO contre les coupures d’internet ordonnées par l’Etat sénégalais
Le recours au nom d’AfricTivistes et de deux journalistes sénégalais vise à obtenir des mesures provisoires pour empêcher de nouvelles coupures d’Internet READ IN ENGLISH Dakar, le 13 février 2024 – Media Defence et le Rule of Law Impact Lab de la Stanford Law School ont déposé un recours devant la Cour de justice […]
Media Defence and SLS’s Rule of Law Impact Lab File Case Before ECOWAS Court Challenging Senegal Internet Shutdowns
Filing on behalf of AfricTivistes and Two Senegalese Journalists Seeks Interim Measures to Prevent Internet Shutdowns. READ IN FRENCH Dakar, February 13, 2024 – Media Defence and the Rule of Law Impact Lab at Stanford Law School have filed a lawsuit before the Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West […]