European Court: newspapers must be free to comment on political matters during elections

The European Court of Human Rights has condemned the use of electoral laws by Russia to restrict critical reporting on politicians.

In 2007, the regional Electoral Committee instituted administrative proceedings against Russian newspaperย Orlovskaya Iskra Gazeta, which had published reports that were strongly critical of a regional governor who stood as a candidate for parliament. The newspaper was ordered to pay a punitive fine, which was upheld on appeal as the domestic courts held the reports constituted โ€œelection campaigningโ€.

MLDI joined forces with the Russian organisation Mass Media Defence Centre to intervene in the case at the European level in 2011, highlighting that Russiaโ€™s law and practice was clearly out of step with European guidance and practice.

In its judgment handed down today the Court agreed and found a violation of the newspaperโ€™s right to freedom of expression. In the Courtโ€™s view, Russiaโ€™s regulatory framework excessively and without compelling justification reduced the scope for press expression and restrictedย Orlovskaya Iskra Gazetaโ€™s freedom to impart information and ideas. The court further noted that free elections and freedom of expression, particularly freedom of political debate, together form the bedrock of any democratic system. The two rights are inter-related: discussion of the candidates and their programmes contributes to the publicโ€™s right to receive information and strengthens votersโ€™ ability to make informed choices between candidates for office.

An open debate is vital in a democracy, especially in an election period. โ€œRestrictions imposed on the print media in times of elections can impair the right of the public to be informed as well as the mediaโ€™s right to freedom of expressionโ€ said Galina Arapova of MMDC. โ€œThey also undermine the mediaโ€™s duty to act as the watchdog of democratic society. Print media should be free to express a political preference and criticise policies.โ€

MLDI Senior Legal Officer Alinda Vermeer said: โ€œOpinions and information of all kinds should be permitted to circulate freely at election time. This judgment adds pressure on Russia and other countries bound by the European Convention of Human Rights to take measures to guarantee the right of the media to report on politics in times of elections and ensure the publicโ€™s right to be adequately informed.โ€

Recent: Strategic Litigation

Banned, Fined, Imprisoned: Saba Sutidze on Georgia’s Press Crackdown

In this edition of Press Freedom Advocates, Media Defence speaks with Saba Sutidze, a human rights and media lawyer at the Tolerance and Diversity Institute, about the escalating crackdown, the

Case Challenging Impunity in the Killing of Journalist Lรฉo Veras Reaches the IACHR Six Years After His Death

On the sixth anniversary of the killing of Brazilian journalist Lourenรงo โ€œLรฉoโ€ Veras, the Institute for Environmental Law and Economics (Instituto de Derecho y Economรญa Ambiental – IDEA) and Media

French Court of Appeal Dismisses Surgeonโ€™s Defamation Lawsuit Against Marsactu and Mediapart

Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal dismissed surgeon Michel Assorโ€™s defamation lawsuit against Marsactu's article published in 2024.

A free press is essential for the protection of human rights.