28 a 30 de junio 2022, Antigua, Guatemala
Media Defence abre convocatoria para la participación de abogados y abogadas que trabajen en América Latina en su seminario de litigio en libertad de expresión. El seminario tendrá lugar en Antigua, Guatemala, entre 28 y 30 de junio 2022.
Las personas que participen en el seminario se convertirán en parte activa de una red de libertad de prensa que dará oportunidades de interacción, de trabajo conjunto y de apoyo para litigio a nivel regional e internacional. Todas las personas que apliquen deben presentar un caso actual o potencial relacionado con libertad de expresión. Si no tienen un caso, pueden presentar una ley, práctica o política con relación a la libertad de expresión que quisieran contradecir en una corte.
Objetivos
Media Defence brinda apoyo a periodistas, bloggers y medios independientes. En años recientes, Media Defence ha apoyado un número significativo de casos relacionados con medios digitales. Estos han incluido demandas en contra de bloqueos de redes sociales o desconexiones de Internet, acciones en contra de leyes de ciber delitos, de ‘noticias falsas’ o de responsabilidad de intermediarios, al igual que casos apuntando a obtener mayores protecciones para la privacidad en línea y la confidencialidad de las fuentes periodísticas.
El seminario de litigio durará tres días (28, 29 y 30 de junio). Específicamente, los objetivos del seminario son:
- Equipar a quienes participen con habilidades y conocimiento para litigar haciendo uso de leyes nacionales e internacionales, al igual que a mecanismos regionales e internacionales relevantes para la libertad de expresión en línea;
- Construir una red de derechos digitales y ayudar a facilitar su involucramiento con mecanismos legales internacionales e iniciativas globales de la sociedad civil; y
- Asistir y desarrollar relaciones de trabajo entre abogados y abogadas trabajando en dichos casos.
Criterios de elegibilidad
Las personas participantes serán escogidas con los siguientes criterios:
- El seminario está abierto para abogados y abogadas que residan en América Latina;
- Quienes apliquen deben estar trabajando en litigio privado o estar trabajando para, o en afiliación con ONGs que promuevan la libertad de expresión en América Latina a través del litigio. De manera excepcional se considerarán aplicaciones de postulantes que no hayan trabajado en casos de libertad de expresión, pero que tengan experiencia en otros casos de derechos humanos y tengan un interés fuerte en trabajar en dichos derechos.
- El máximo de participantes será de 12;
- Solo se aceptarán aplicaciones de personas competentes para comunicarse en español;
- Tienen que tener un interés demostrado, o conocimiento en libertad de expresión o temas relacionados;
- Tienen que tener un interés demostrado, o conocimiento en derecho internacional y regional de los derechos humanos;
- Su aplicación debe incluir un caso de estudio que estén litigando o pretendan litigar y que pueda ser discutido durante el seminario. Los casos presentados deben involucrar una violación de la libertad de expresión en línea. Quienes no tengan un caso, pueden identificar una ley, práctica o política relacionada con la libertad de expresión que quieran contradecir en cortes.
- No obstante, deben demostrar su capacidad e intención de iniciar el caso después del seminario;
- La siguiente es una lista no exhaustiva de los temas que pueden ser abordados en los casos:
- Difamación civil o penal;
- Violencia contra periodistas, incluyendo ataques físicos o violencia en línea;
- Restricciones a medios impresos o en línea;
- Privacidad en línea;
- Seguridad nacional.
Media Defence está comprometida a promover igualdad y diversidad y, por consiguiente, considerará aspectos de género, edad y país de origen a la hora de escoger a quienes participen en el seminario.
Cómo solicitario
Por favor diligencie el formulario de aplicación anexo y envíelo a Hannah Stoate a
hannah.stoate@mediadefence.org. La fecha límite de aplicación es el 29 de mayo 2022.
Las personas pre-seleccionadas serán contactadas después de la fecha de cierre de la convocatoria.
Descargue el formulario para aplicar en este link: formulario de aplicación
Para tener información sobre cómo Media Defence usará y protegerá sus datos, por favor revise nuestra política de privacidad (en inglés).
Fecha límite de aplicación: 29 de mayo 2022
Para más información, incluida una lista de preguntas frecuentes, consulte la convocatoria.
Recent News
14 Years After The Diappearance Of Journalist Prageeth Ekneligoda, His Family Continue The Fight For Answers
On 24 January 2010, just two days before a crucial presidential election in Sri Lanka, journalist Prageeth Ekneligoda disappeared. Since then, his wife, Sandya Ekneligoda, has tirelessly fought for a thorough investigation and for those responsible to be brought to justice. Yet, to date, no effective investigation has been carried out and no perpetrators have been held accountable. For 14 years, Sandya and her two sons have lived in uncertainty, hoping for Prageeth’s return with no resolution in sight. Throughout this prolonged ordeal, Sandya has faced persistent intimidation, threats and harassment for her efforts.
Prageeth, a well-known critic of the government, was last seen in the suburbs of Colombo, Sri Lanka’s capital. As a cartoonist and columnist for the news website Lanka e News, he used his platform to expose corruption and speak out against abuses of power. His disappearance happened during a period of when widespread violence against journalists was recorded. From 2005 to 2015, dozens of journalists were murdered, assaulted, or disappeared, often in connection with their coverage of Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war.
Initial Obstacles and Legal Efforts
Soon after Prageeth’s disappearance, Sandya encountered resistance from the authorities. In February 2010, after the police refused to register her missing person’s report, Sandya took legal action by filing a habeas corpus petition before the Sri Lankan Court of Appeal. Her petition requested that the authorities produce her husband in court. In response, the Court of Appeal directed a lower court, the Homagama Magistrate Court, to investigate the matter and report back.
Over the next few years, the Colombo Crime Division carried out a slow-moving inquiry that yielded no results. Meanwhile, government officials made baseless claims in 2011 and 2013, alleging that Prageeth was living abroad. These assertions were later discredited, and no substantial evidence was ever produced to support them.
Breakthroughs and Setbacks in the Investigation
In 2015, after a political shift ousted the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration, the investigation into Prageeth’s disappearance was revitalised and transferred to the Gang and Robberies Unit of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID). Witnesses came forward with testimonies indicating that Prageeth had been seen in an army camp after his abduction. The CID investigation found that a military intelligence unit was responsible for Prageeth’s disappearance and likely death and reported that the military failed to provide the necessary information to conduct a comprehensive investigation.
In November 2019, after more than 300 hearings, the Attorney General indicted nine military intelligence officers before the Colombo High Court on several charges related to Prageeth’s disappearance.
Political Interference and Continued Struggle
Despite this apparent progress, the path to justice has been repeatedly obstructed by political interference. Only days after the first hearing in the criminal case before Colombo High Court was held, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the former President’s brother and also former defence secretary, was elected president. Under Gotabaya’s administration, a Commission of Inquiry into Political Victimisation was established. Human Rights Watch criticised the commission, suggesting it was aimed at derailing investigations into the president’s relatives and allies.
All nine accused military intelligence officers filed complaints with the Commission, which ultimately recommended their acquittal of all charges, further delaying the case and denying justice to Prageeth’s family.
The trial remains ongoing despite many challenges, from retracted witness statements, and repeated delays in hearings to changes in judges. Additionally, the CID officer who has led the investigation into Prageeth’s disappearance has reportedly received death threats and fled the country.
A widespread issue
Prageeth’s disappearance is not an isolated event, but emblematic of a broader pattern of enforced disappearances that has affected Sri Lanka for decades. The country ranks among the highest in the world for enforced disappearances, with estimates suggesting that between 60,000 and 100,000 people have vanished since the late 1980s. These disappearances have been used as a tool to instil fear, suppress dissent, and maintain control.
Despite criminalising enforced disappearances in 2018, the Sri Lankan government’s efforts to aid affected families and uncover the truth have been criticised for their inconsistency and inefficacy.
The anguish of enforced disappearance extends far beyond the immediate act of abduction. For families like the Ekneligodas, the emotional toll is profound, leaving them in a state of constant uncertainty. Additionally, while men are most often the victims of enforced disappearances, it is frequently women who lead the search for truth after a loved one disappears. According to Amnesty International, women often face additional risks of persecution and violence while fighting for answers, as well as economic hardship due to the loss of their families’ primary earners.
The stories of individuals like Sandya and Prageeth highlight the urgent need for accountability and transparency. Addressing these abuses is essential to protecting human rights, including freedom of expression, and ensuring that those who seek justice are not silenced.
We recognise the strength and resilience of families who continue to search for their loved ones. Their courage is a powerful reminder to stand with them and to ensure their voices are heard and their demands for justice are met.
Media Defence is proud to support Sandya Ekneligoda’s legal efforts.
We’re Hiring: Finance and Operations Officer
Location Hybrid / London Expectation to work one day in the office. Salary £32,512 – £34,000 Contract Permanent, full-time Hours 37.5 Responsible to Finance Manager Key relationships Finance & Operations Team, Legal Team, Grants Team Closing date Monday 23rd September 2024 by 5pm About Media Defence Media Defence is a charity that helps media to […]
We’re Hiring: Events Coordinator and Team Assistant
Closing date: 18 September 2024 Salary: £31,000 – £34,000 Location: Hybrid / London. We combine home working and office-based working to suit individual and organisational needs. This post requires presence in the office in Central London at least once a week. Contract: Permanent, full-time Hours: 37.5 hours, occasional evening and weekend work Responsible to: Finance […]