CLOSE

Capacity Building: New report on the Impact of Media Defence’s Partner Grants

Capacity Building: New report on the Impact of Media Defence’s Partner Grants

We recently carried out an impact assessment of our capacity building programme to support National Media Defence Centres across the world. This support is aimed at increasing the capacity of these organisations, and building a strong and sustainable network of legal defence centres for independent media across the globe.

In order to measure the impact of our support, we used an approach inspired by the Most Significant Change (MSC) methodology. It consists of collecting a cluster of testimonies and stories from stakeholders using a template of questions aimed at measuring the impact of MLDI’s support for these organisations. Once assembled, the answers constituted ‘significant change stories’.

We then carried out a workshop to review the stories and identify themes of change and impact.

Download the full report.

In total eight organisations’ stories were collected, and they all converged on common themes that allowed MLDI to gauge its role in supporting these organisations. These themes have been grouped into three key roles:

  • MLDI as a crucial donor
  • MLDI as a capacity builder
  • MLDI a catalyst.

 

The partner with the ‘winning story’ (or the one which reported the most change) explained the impact of MLDI’s support, stating

“the changes  resulted exclusively because of MLDI ’s support and funding, since without that funding no organisation would be able to provide such services …. Other funders, at the moment, seem uninterested in media related projects in general, and media legal defence is never listed among priority areas in their calls for proposals. Therefore, we could say that without MLDI’s support, journalists and media would find themselves in far more precarious situation.”

 

Meanwhile, other partner organisations said, of MLDI’s support:

“The project allowed the organisation to increase its international profile, through involvement in the informal network of media defence organisations from the region.”

“MLDI’s early support … allowed [the organisation] to take its first steps in building a legal unit. This provided the infrastructure on which all our subsequent accomplishments have been built. That we were already engaged in the defence of journalists created a virtuous circle which allowed us to raise more funds, defend more clients, provide better support and go to donors to allow us to do more”.

 

Our national media defence centre programme continues to be a growing area of our work and we now fund and support 14 different defence centres in 13 different countries.

You can download the full report here.

 

Attached files:
PDF icon Capacity Building Impact Assessment 2018

Recent News

Meet the Team: Chloe Pethick, MEL Officer

Can you tell us a little about yourself? I’m Chloe Pethick, and I joined Media Defence in February 2024 as the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Officer. I hold a BA in Russian and International Relations, and an MA in Russian and Eurasian Studies, so I’ve previously had quite a strong regional focus. Prior to joining […]

Read

World Press Freedom Day Side Event: Profiling and surveillance, a renewed challenge to freedom of expression

From May 2-4 2024, UNESCO and the government of Chile will host the 31st edition of World Press Freedom Day in Santiago. The global commemorative conference commemorates the vital role of journalism and information access in fostering a sustainable future that upholds diversity of voices. Media Defence is organising a side event at the conference […]

Read

Landmark Ruling: Kenya’s High Court Declares Colonial-era Subversion Laws Unconstitutional

Media Defence welcomes the verdict of the High Court in Nakuru, striking down sections of the Kenyan Penal Code which criminalise subversion, citing them as relics of colonial oppression that curtail freedom of expression. Justice Samwel Mohochi, delivering the judgment, asserted that these provisions were overly broad and vague, stifling dissent rather than serving any […]

Read