We recently carried out an impact assessment of our capacity building programme to support National Media Defence Centres across the world. This support is aimed at increasing the capacity of these organisations, and building a strong and sustainable network of legal defence centres for independent media across the globe.
In order to measure the impact of our support, we used an approach inspired by the Most Significant Change (MSC) methodology. It consists of collecting a cluster of testimonies and stories from stakeholders using a template of questions aimed at measuring the impact of MLDI’s support for these organisations. Once assembled, the answers constituted ‘significant change stories’.
We then carried out a workshop to review the stories and identify themes of change and impact.
In total eight organisations’ stories were collected, and they all converged on common themes that allowed MLDI to gauge its role in supporting these organisations. These themes have been grouped into three key roles:
- MLDI as a crucial donor
- MLDI as a capacity builder
- MLDI a catalyst.
The partner with the ‘winning story’ (or the one which reported the most change) explained the impact of MLDI’s support, stating
“the changes resulted exclusively because of MLDI ’s support and funding, since without that funding no organisation would be able to provide such services …. Other funders, at the moment, seem uninterested in media related projects in general, and media legal defence is never listed among priority areas in their calls for proposals. Therefore, we could say that without MLDI’s support, journalists and media would find themselves in far more precarious situation.”
Meanwhile, other partner organisations said, of MLDI’s support:
“The project allowed the organisation to increase its international profile, through involvement in the informal network of media defence organisations from the region.”
“MLDI’s early support … allowed [the organisation] to take its first steps in building a legal unit. This provided the infrastructure on which all our subsequent accomplishments have been built. That we were already engaged in the defence of journalists created a virtuous circle which allowed us to raise more funds, defend more clients, provide better support and go to donors to allow us to do more”.
Our national media defence centre programme continues to be a growing area of our work and we now fund and support 14 different defence centres in 13 different countries.
You can download the full report here.
Attached files:
Capacity Building Impact Assessment 2018
Recent News
Media Defence Concludes Asia Pacific Litigation Surgery in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
From 18th to 20th November 2025, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Media Defence held the Asia Pacific Litigation Surgery, a training that combined expert-led presentations, case analysis, and peer-to-peer learning across a range of critical topics regarding press freedom. The three-day programme brought together 12 participants, representing 10 countries across the region: Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Mongolia, […]
Building Solidarity Across Borders: Women Lawyers Connect Through Media Defence’s Peer Mentorship Programme
Media Defence’s Peer-to-Peer Mentorship Programme brings together lawyers from around the world to strengthen their skills, confidence, and professional networks. Its most recent cohort marked a significant milestone: the programme’s first women-focused edition. Over fourteen months, 22 women lawyers working on freedom of expression issues met across languages, regions, and career stages, forming a supportive […]
Protection Order Against South African Journalist Thomo Nkgadima Set Aside: The Campaign for Free Expression Warns of Rising Misuse of Harassment Laws
Media Defence and the Campaign for Free Expression (CFE), welcome the decision of the Praktiseer Magistrates’ Court in Limpopo to set aside the protection order previously granted against freelance journalist Thomo Nkgadima. The ruling affirms that South Africa’s Protection from Harassment Act cannot be weaponised to obstruct legitimate newsgathering, nor used as a tool by […]