“This was a victory for the Burundi Union of Journalists and for all the press in Burundi. The decision was also very important for the whole region”
In its first judgment on free speech, the East African Court of Justice found Burundi’s 2013 Press Law to be in breach of fundamental principles of the rule of law and democracy. The landmark ruling sets a precedent for all members of the East African Community including Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya, all of whom score low on the World Press Freedom Index.
MLDI brought the case on behalf of the Burundi Union of Journalists after Law No. 1/11, known simply as the ‘Press Law’, was passed in 2013 in anticipation of the 2015 elections in the country. The law had been used to imprison journalists who refused to reveal their sources and, through a government-controlled media council, effectively created a regime of prior censorship. It was enacted despite criticism from journalists, human rights organisations and even the UN Secretary General.
MLDI’s in-house legal team led the legal challenge, assisted by a team of lawyers acting pro bono. Renowned Kenyan lawyer Donald Deya, CEO of the Pan African Lawyers’ Union, argued the case in Court. The East African Court’s judgment was handed down in May, before the scheduled elections, but amidst severe political turmoil.
Despite the ruling, 2015 has been a challenging year for journalists and media outlets in Burundi. In July, President Pierre Nkurunziza won a highly-controversial third term, provoking an attempted coup, months of civil unrest and a string of killings. The media have been severely harassed throughout, and the four leading privately owned radio stations were closed down.
Alexandre Niyungeko, the founding president of the 300-member Burundi Union of Journalists says: “It’s impossible for journalists to work in this country when free media are destroyed by Nkurunziza’s power. This is a chaotic situation in which independent media have been silenced and the majority of journalists and their families are in exile.”
Despite the continued challenges, Niyungeko, who is also in exile, believes that winning the case marked a watershed moment for press freedom:
“This was a victory for the Burundi Union of Journalists and for all the press in Burundi. The decision was also very important for the whole region because the legislature will think more thoroughly in the future before adopting restrictive laws.”
The judgment is strong precedent for future cases. It removes any doubt over whether the East African Court of Justice can consider freedom of expression cases, despite its lack of explicit human rights jurisdiction, because press freedom has been recognised as a fundamental principle for the rule of law in the East African Community.
MLDI has encouraged its partners to follow up and the Human Rights Network for Journalists has already brought a case before the Court challenging Uganda’s criminal defamation laws. MLDI’s Legal Director, Nani Jansen, explained that this is exactly how MLDI sees its role: “The Court’s decision is a significant first step in the East African Court of Justice’s press freedom jurisprudence, and by accepting jurisdiction over such matters the East African Court of Justice has paved the way for similar legal challenges in the future. This is what MLDI’s role should be: to break new ground and lead the way for its partners to challenge illegitimate restrictions on press freedom. HRNJ’s case challenging Uganda’s criminal defamation laws before the East African Court of Justice was made possible by the Court’s judgment on the Burundi Press Law, and we hope to support other such cases in the future.”
This story was published as part of MLDI’s 2015 Annual Review. In the last 12 months we have won landmark judgments and we helped nearly 600 bloggers and journalists defend cases against them. The demand for our work is high and more and more journalists and bloggers turn to us for help. Please donate to our defence fund and help us help them!
Recent Case Studies
Gladys Mbuyah is a barrister and renowned human rights activist working in Cameroon. She has been part of Media Defence’s network for several years, having attended our digital rights litigation surgeries. She is currently part of our peer support programme for women lawyers in sub-Saharan Africa. President of the Cameroon Bar Association Social Affairs Commission, […]
Emilio Palacio Urrutia v Ecuador: The judgment paving the way for anti-SLAPP regulations in the Americas
SLAPPs are a form of legal harassment that have the purpose of driving information that is in the public interest into the darkness. These types of cases – aiming to silence speech on matters of public interest – are becoming a more common tool used by powerful individuals against journalists. Thankfully, awareness around them is […]
Paola Ugaz is an award-winning Peruvian investigative journalist. In 2015, she co-authored – with Pedro Salinas – a book entitled Mitad Monjes, Mitad Soldados (Half-Monks, Half Soldiers). The book uncovers an alleged pattern of sexual, physical, and psychological abuse within the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, a Peruvian Catholic organisation. Paola Ugaz has since faced numerous lawsuits […]