Media Defence has filed a second application to the European Court of Human Rights on behalf of citizen journalist Elena Popa. Ms Popa has been targeted in multiple lawsuits after she set up a Facebook group. The group was created in order to share information about the unlawful practices of care work recruitment agencies operating across Austria and Germany.
Ms Popa, a domestic care worker herself, set up the Facebook group “Beware of dishonest intermediaries” in 2015. It functioned as a platform for workers (mostly women and migrants from Romania and Slovakia) to share information about the agencies that placed them in homes to provide domestic care. Working in this relatively unregulated industry, many of the workers had been subject to dangerous and illegal conditions and other exploitative practices, with limited avenue for recourse.
Popa’s Facebook group grew quickly, gaining more than 24,000 members. However, in 2018, she was subject to a barrage of civil lawsuits filed in Romania by recruitment companies named in the Facebook group. Popa was accused of facilitating defamatory discourse. Some claimants even cited posts that Popa had not actually participated in herself but, as administrator of the group, had allowed to remain online.
Media Defence filed third party interventions in three of the domestic cases brought against Popa. In December 2019, together with Romania human rights lawyer Constantin Cojocariu, we filed an application to the ECtHR challenging court orders than Popa pay 5,000 Romania Leu and stop posting “defamatory” comments.
The most recent ECtHR application makes the case that Ms Popa was engaged in reporting on matters of public interest, contrary to the findings of the domestic courts.
For vulnerable populations such as domestic care workers, the internet and social media platforms are vital to ensuring they can share information and exercise the right to freedom of expression. Popa’s case exemplifies a growing and dangerous trend where litigation is used strategically to intimidate and silence public interest speech online.
Call for Consultants: Update of Training Materials on Freedom of Expression in South and Southeast Asia
Purpose of the consultancy contract This is a call for consultants to review and update eleven existing training modules on freedom of expression in South and Southeast Asia. Background Media Defence’s vision is a world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public […]
Media Defence et l’Impact Lab pour l’Etat de droit de Stanford Law School saisissent la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO contre les coupures d’internet ordonnées par l’Etat sénégalais
Le recours au nom d’AfricTivistes et de deux journalistes sénégalais vise à obtenir des mesures provisoires pour empêcher de nouvelles coupures d’Internet READ IN ENGLISH Dakar, le 13 février 2024 – Media Defence et le Rule of Law Impact Lab de la Stanford Law School ont déposé un recours devant la Cour de justice […]
Media Defence and SLS’s Rule of Law Impact Lab File Case Before ECOWAS Court Challenging Senegal Internet Shutdowns
Filing on behalf of AfricTivistes and Two Senegalese Journalists Seeks Interim Measures to Prevent Internet Shutdowns. READ IN FRENCH Dakar, February 13, 2024 – Media Defence and the Rule of Law Impact Lab at Stanford Law School have filed a lawsuit before the Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West […]