Media Defence Logo

CLOSE

Wieder and Guarnieri v UK: Media Defence intervenes in case concerning UK cyber operations abroad

Wieder and Guarnieri v UK: Media Defence intervenes in case concerning UK cyber operations abroad

Media Defence has filed a third-party intervention in the cases of Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom at the European Court of Human Rights. The cases are about allegations of interference by UK intelligence agencies with the communications and related data of an Italian national living in Berlin, and a US citizen living in Florida. Both applicants have worked for news organisations, and one of them has published extensively on surveillance and privacy. The allegations were made following the revelations by Edward Snowden concerning electronic surveillance programmes operated by US and UK intelligence agencies. The applicants’ cases were dismissed in the domestic proceedings on the basis they did not come within the jurisdiction of the UK as they were not within its territory.

The cases provide the Court with an opportunity to define ‘jurisdiction’ in a way that accommodates technological developments relating to cyber operations and ensures a proper level of protection for modern day journalism. The intervention focuses on two issues. First, it argues that state conduct of cyber operations outside its territorial boundaries can give rise to the exercise of jurisdiction by that state, and secondly, it argues that the safeguards that protect against the possibility of unlawful interference with journalistic communications within a state’s territory should also apply outside its territory, and no distinction should be made between interception of communications and receipt of solicited intercept material.

Media Defence Legal Director Pádraig Hughes said “States have the capacity to interfere with modern day investigative reporting, which often involves investigations into complex topics across multiple jurisdictions. Where that interference takes place outside that state’s territorial borders, journalists should be afforded the same protections as would apply if the interference took place within the territory of that state.”

Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom – intervention

Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom – facts of the case

(Note: Media Defence was granted permission by the Court to intervene on condition the written submissions do not comment on the facts or merits of the case and only address general principles of law applicable to the determination of the case.)

 

Recent News

Webinar: “Freedom of expression in a time of war”

On Thursday July 21st, 11am BST, we’re hosting a webinar to explore the impact of conflict on freedom of expression. We’ll hear from those directly involved about the violence journalists experience, and the longer-term implications of war on press freedoms. Register here. The Context War reporting by independent journalists is essential to ensuring the public […]

Read

Lawyer Impact Survey 2021

About the survey In 2021, we carried out our second Lawyer Impact Survey to assess the impact of our support to lawyers. We support lawyers with both our emergency defence and our strategic litigation programmes. Through these programmes, we offer pro bono legal support, as well as financial support for lawyers in order to cover […]

Read

We are Hiring for a Finance and Operations Director

We are looking for a talented, fully-qualified finance professional who brings strong strategic and operational experience across all areas of budgeting, financial reporting, governance and risk. The role of the Finance and Operations Director is a key part of our organisation and of our leadership team. As a strategic advisor to the CEO, our Board […]

Read