CLOSE

Wieder and Guarnieri v UK: Media Defence intervenes in case concerning UK cyber operations abroad

Wieder and Guarnieri v UK: Media Defence intervenes in case concerning UK cyber operations abroad

Media Defence has filed a third-party intervention in the cases of Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom at the European Court of Human Rights. The cases are about allegations of interference by UK intelligence agencies with the communications and related data of an Italian national living in Berlin, and a US citizen living in Florida. Both applicants have worked for news organisations, and one of them has published extensively on surveillance and privacy. The allegations were made following the revelations by Edward Snowden concerning electronic surveillance programmes operated by US and UK intelligence agencies. The applicants’ cases were dismissed in the domestic proceedings on the basis they did not come within the jurisdiction of the UK as they were not within its territory.

The cases provide the Court with an opportunity to define ‘jurisdiction’ in a way that accommodates technological developments relating to cyber operations and ensures a proper level of protection for modern day journalism. The intervention focuses on two issues. First, it argues that state conduct of cyber operations outside its territorial boundaries can give rise to the exercise of jurisdiction by that state, and secondly, it argues that the safeguards that protect against the possibility of unlawful interference with journalistic communications within a state’s territory should also apply outside its territory, and no distinction should be made between interception of communications and receipt of solicited intercept material.

Media Defence Legal Director Pádraig Hughes said “States have the capacity to interfere with modern day investigative reporting, which often involves investigations into complex topics across multiple jurisdictions. Where that interference takes place outside that state’s territorial borders, journalists should be afforded the same protections as would apply if the interference took place within the territory of that state.”

Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom – intervention

Wieder and Guarnieri v United Kingdom – facts of the case

(Note: Media Defence was granted permission by the Court to intervene on condition the written submissions do not comment on the facts or merits of the case and only address general principles of law applicable to the determination of the case.)

 

Recent News

Azerbaijan held liable for blocking Radio Free Europe’s websites by ECtHR

The case relates to the blocking of RFE’s websites in 2017, and was one of four separate cases involving website blocking that were considered by the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’). The websites were blocked with immediate effect, pending an application for a court order by the relevant government agency. According to the government, […]

Read

Media Defence Files Intervention at European Court to Protect Anonymity Online

Media Defence has filed a third-party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Koumiotis v Greece to protect anonymity online. The case concerns criminal proceedings against the applicant, the owner and manager of an online blog. The applicant, following a series of posts criticising a businessman, was convicted of slanderous defamation. The […]

Read

Call for Consultants: Independent evaluation of ‘International Network of Internet Freedom Lawyers (INIFL)’ multi-regional project

1. About Media Defence Media Defence’s Vision A world where journalists no longer face legal challenges that threaten their ability to report freely and independently on issues of public interest, allowing citizens to be better informed, able to hold those in power to account. Media Defence’s Mission  To ensure legal protection of journalists and media […]

Read