Constitutional Court declares law facilitating SLAPPs in Colombia ‘unconstitutional’.
In Colombia, there is a 75-year-old law that regulates the conduct of civil lawsuits against press publications. On the 13th May 2021, the Constitutional Court of Colombia declared it unconstitutional.
The law stated that where a person stood accused of causing harm through a publication, they could be required to pay damages. Unless, that is, they could demonstrate that they had acted in good faith.
The constitutional challenge was brought by Colombian organisation El Veinte on the basis that the law violated freedom of expression, due process, and the protection of journalistic sources.
To support the challenge, we submitted an amicus brief to the Constitutional Court in the case. The brief argued that the application of this law placed a disproportionate burden on journalists and media outlets. The brief also argued that this law facilitated Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs). As a result, this produced a chilling effect on anyone who reported on contentious subjects or public interest issues.
The Constitutional Court considered that, while in certain circumstances liability might arise in the context of exercising the right to free speech, the application of the impugned law was disproportionate and caused a chilling effect. Furthermore, it noted that the law could hamper journalists’ ability to work. While certain standards, as well as the rules of civil law and civil procedural law, should apply to the media, this should not be at the expense of specific newsgathering techniques required to advance public interest journalism.
Following the decision, Padraig Hughes, Media Defence’s Legal Director said: “the constitutional challenge has highlighted how powerful figures use old laws to silence journalists and independent media from discussing public interest issues. The Constitutional Court’s decision is welcome and El Veinte deserve enormous credit for identifying and successfully challenging this legislation.”
If you want to find out more about SLAPPs in Colombia and around the world, click here.
To download the text of Media Defence’s intervention in Spanish, click here.
To download the text of El Veinte’s challenge in Spanish, click here.
If you are a journalist or citizen journalist in need of support, please click here.
If you would like to support our work, please click here.
By Lucas Anastácio Mourão, partner at Flora, Matheus & Mangabeira Sociedade de Advogados. The legal solutions devised to combat problems, as they arise with each new period and context, often seem definitive at the time of their conception. Yet as technologies and behaviours evolve over time, so must our legal responses change and adapt. The […]
We’re hiring for a Project Assistant to join our Empowering Women in Digital Rights Advocacy project. The project develops legal communities, in particular women lawyers, to defend, promote and strengthen freedom of expression online. For example, under this project, Media Defence: (i) conducts litigation surgeries for lawyers in sub-Saharan Africa on litigating digital rights cases […]
Lucas Anastácio Mourão, sócio do Flora, Matheus & Mangabeira Sociedade de Advogados. Os problemas apresentados por cada contexto e cada época refletem um dado tipo de solução jurídica que, embora geralmente pareça definitiva no momento de sua concepção, muda e se adapta através do tempo de acordo com as tecnologias disponíveis e também com os […]