The European Court of Human Rights has held that a refusal to grant a journalist access to an asylum seeker reception centre in Hungary violated his right to freedom of expression. In its decision, Szurovecz v Hungary, the court emphasised that newsgathering, including first-hand observation, is an essential part of press freedom. Media Defence intervened in the case, along with a coalition of NGOs.
In September 2015, Hungarian journalist Illes Szurovecz requested access to the Debrecen Reception Centre. The centre had become a major housing centre for asylum seekers entering Hungary although serious concerns had been raised about their treatment. Szurovecz sought permission to enter the centre in order to interview asylum seekers and take photographs. Hungarian authorities rejected his request, citing concerns for the privacy and security of the asylum seekers living there. Szurovecz appealed that decision, without success, and subsequently took his case to the Strasbourg court.
MLDI was part of a coalition of international organisations that intervened in the case. The intervention emphasised that newsgathering, including physical access to the places where important events are developing, is an essential component of investigative reporting.
Consistent with this position, the court noted that journalistic access to physical locations is often critical to the newsgathering process, particularly where the state is exercising control over these locations. It emphasised that the media, when acting as a ‘watchdog’, can, through its physical presence at a particular location, hold authorities to account for their conduct. In the context of this case, it found that the authorities had failed to properly consider the journalistic purpose in conducting first-hand research through interviews and photography; that is, to investigate the conditions under which the asylum seekers lived, and their treatment. The judgment indicates that the court will scrutinise carefully any restrictions on the media’s access to locations, particularly where there is clear public interest involved.
Journalists in Hungary still complain that they are denied access to places where asylum seekers are detained. These places remain heavily guarded, and although reports of dire living conditions are widespread journalists are still unable to properly investigate the conditions at these places of detention, and the treatment of those living there. The court’s judgment is therefore timely. Incidents like this, where matters of public interest are taking place in state controlled locations, happen every day throughout Europe. The court’s decision affirms that restrictions on journalistic access to those locations should be subject to strict scrutiny.
Media Defence intervened in the case along with Index on Censorship, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, European Publishers Council, PEN International, Hungarian Helsinki Committee, the Dutch Association of Journalists and the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom
With thanks to Stibbe for its assistance with the intervention.
See the Court’s Judgment: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196418
For a copy of the intervention, please click here.
For more information contact Pádraig Hughes, Legal Director: Padraig.firstname.lastname@example.org
As part of our Digital Rights Advocates Project, Media Defence announces its new Summary Modules on Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression Online developed in collaboration with ALT Advisory. These modules provide an overview of relevant principles and case law for lawyers in sub-Saharan Africa interested in litigating digital rights cases. The modules are a […]
Welcome to the Digital Rights Advocates Blog Series, where we hear from lawyers litigating digital rights in sub-Saharan Africa. Digital rights have become indispensable for people around the world to exercise and enjoy their fundamental rights. Independent media is increasingly moving online – from established newspapers and television channels to bloggers and human rights activists […]
2020 has been an extraordinary year, with the world facing unprecedented challenges due to COVID-19. People moved their lives almost entirely online, even as they took to the streets to protest in staggering numbers. We have seen a rise in the number of governments clamping down on freedom of speech, ostensibly to protect citizens from […]