{"id":669,"date":"2021-04-20T10:10:31","date_gmt":"2021-04-20T09:10:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/?post_type=publication&#038;p=669"},"modified":"2021-04-20T10:28:06","modified_gmt":"2021-04-20T09:28:06","slug":"la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/","title":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l&#8217;Holocauste : un cas particulier ?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Certains commentateurs soutiennent que les questions de l\u2019appel au g\u00e9nocide et de la n\u00e9gation de l\u2019Holocauste constituent des cas particuliers dans le d\u00e9bat sur le discours de haine et l\u2019incitation \u00e0 la haine. Selon la <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/fr\/genocideprevention\/documents\/atrocity-crimes\/Doc.1_Convention%20sur%20la%20pr\u00e9vention%20et%20la%20r\u00e9pression%20du%20crime%20de%20g\u00e9nocide.pdf\">Convention sur le g\u00e9nocide de 1948<\/a>, \u00ab&nbsp;l\u2019incitation directe et publique \u00e0 commettre le g\u00e9nocide&nbsp;\u00bb est un acte punissable,[footnote]Assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des Nations unies, Convention pour la pr\u00e9vention et la r\u00e9pression du crime de g\u00e9nocide, r\u00e9solution 260 (III) (1948), article&nbsp;3 (accessible sur&nbsp;: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/fr\/genocideprevention\/documents\/atrocity-crimes\/Doc.1_Convention%20sur%20la%20pr\u00e9vention%20et%20la%20r\u00e9pression%20du%20crime%20de%20g\u00e9nocide.pdf\">https:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/genocideprevention\/documents\/atrocity-crimes\/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf<\/a>).[\/footnote] suivant le r\u00f4le des m\u00e9dias dans la perp\u00e9tuation de la haine contre le peuple juif en Allemagne et l\u2019appel \u00e0 son extermination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De m\u00eame, au Rwanda, les m\u00e9dias ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le crucial pendant le g\u00e9nocide en attisant la haine et en diffusant de la propagande, ce qui a conduit aux premi\u00e8res poursuites devant le Tribunal p\u00e9nal international pour le Rwanda (<a href=\"https:\/\/unictr.irmct.org\/fr\/tribunal\">TPIR<\/a>) pour \u00ab&nbsp;incitation directe et publique \u00e0 commettre le g\u00e9nocide.&nbsp;\u00bb De la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re que le discours de haine, l\u2019incitation au g\u00e9nocide a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9finie comme un crime inachev\u00e9, ce qui signifie qu\u2019il n\u2019est pas n\u00e9cessaire qu\u2019un g\u00e9nocide ait effectivement eu lieu pour que le crime soit commis, mais qu\u2019il faut qu\u2019il y ait eu intention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">L\u2019une des affaires les plus notables port\u00e9es contre des journalistes au TPIR est celle de&nbsp;<em><a href=\"https:\/\/unictr.irmct.org\/fr\/cases\/ictr-99-52\">\u00ab&nbsp;Nahimana et al&nbsp;\u00bb<\/a><\/em>, connue sous le nom de \u00ab&nbsp;Proc\u00e8s des m\u00e9dias&nbsp;\u00bb.[footnote]Tribunal p\u00e9nal international pour le Rwanda, affaire n\u00b0&nbsp;ICTR-99-52-T, (2003) (accessible sur&nbsp;:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/unictr.irmct.org\/fr\/cases\/ictr-99-52\">https:\/\/unictr.irmct.org\/fr\/cases\/ictr-99-52<\/a>).[\/footnote] Deux des personnes interrog\u00e9es \u00e9taient les fondateurs d\u2019une station de radio qui diffusait de la propagande anti-Tutsi avant le g\u00e9nocide et les noms et num\u00e9ros de plaques d\u2019immatriculation des victimes pr\u00e9vues pendant le g\u00e9nocide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/resource-library\/documents\/rs-fra.pdf\">Le Statut de Rome<\/a> instituant la Cour p\u00e9nale internationale \u00e9tablit \u00e9galement le crime d\u2019incitation au g\u00e9nocide.[footnote]Cour p\u00e9nale internationale, \u00ab&nbsp;Statut de Rome de la Cour p\u00e9nale internationale&nbsp;\u00bb, articles&nbsp;6, 25 et 33 (2002) (accessible sur&nbsp;: https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/resource-library\/documents\/rs-fra.pdf).[\/footnote]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Le g\u00e9nocide des Juifs dans l\u2019Europe occup\u00e9e par les nazis a \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement tellement formateur dans la cr\u00e9ation du syst\u00e8me europ\u00e9en des droits de l\u2019homme que la n\u00e9gation de l\u2019Holocauste (pr\u00e9tendre que le g\u00e9nocide n\u2019a pas eu lieu) est une infraction dans plusieurs pays et est trait\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re particuli\u00e8re dans la jurisprudence de la Cour europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme, m\u00eame si on la compare \u00e0 des cas similaires de r\u00e9visionnisme historique.[footnote]Par exemple, voir les affaires <em>\u00ab&nbsp;L\u00e9hideux et Isorni v France&nbsp;\u00bb<\/em>, Demande n<sup>o<\/sup> 55\/1997\/839\/1045 (1998), et \u00ab&nbsp;<em>Garaudyv. France&nbsp;\u00bb, <\/em>Demande n<sup>o<\/sup>&nbsp;65831\/01 (2003), toutes deux devant la Cour europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme.[\/footnote]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Certains commentateurs soutiennent que les questions de l\u2019appel au g\u00e9nocide et de la n\u00e9gation de l\u2019Holocauste constituent des cas particuliers dans le d\u00e9bat sur le discours de haine et l\u2019incitation \u00e0 la haine. Selon la Convention sur le g\u00e9nocide de 1948, \u00ab&nbsp;l\u2019incitation directe et publique \u00e0 commettre le g\u00e9nocide&nbsp;\u00bb est un acte punissable,[footnote]Assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":662,"menu_order":281,"template":"page-templates\/chapter.php","publication-category":[],"class_list":["post-669","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l&#039;Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l&#039;Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Certains commentateurs soutiennent que les questions de l\u2019appel au g\u00e9nocide et de la n\u00e9gation de l\u2019Holocauste constituent des cas particuliers dans le d\u00e9bat sur le discours de haine et l\u2019incitation \u00e0 la haine. Selon la Convention sur le g\u00e9nocide de 1948, \u00ab&nbsp;l\u2019incitation directe et publique \u00e0 commettre le g\u00e9nocide&nbsp;\u00bb est un acte punissable,[footnote]Assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"eReader\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-20T09:28:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\\\/?lang=fr\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\\\/?lang=fr\",\"name\":\"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l'Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-20T09:10:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-20T09:28:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\\\/?lang=fr#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\\\/?lang=fr\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\\\/?lang=fr#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Publications\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Modules de synth\u00e8se sur les litiges relatifs aux droits num\u00e9riques et \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 d&rsquo;expression en ligne\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/?lang=fr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Module 6 : Discours de haine\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/publications\\\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\\\/discours-de-haine\\\/?lang=fr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":5,\"name\":\"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l&rsquo;Holocauste : un cas particulier ?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/\",\"name\":\"eReader\",\"description\":\"Media Defence\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mediadefence.org\\\/ereader\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l'Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l'Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader","og_description":"Certains commentateurs soutiennent que les questions de l\u2019appel au g\u00e9nocide et de la n\u00e9gation de l\u2019Holocauste constituent des cas particuliers dans le d\u00e9bat sur le discours de haine et l\u2019incitation \u00e0 la haine. Selon la Convention sur le g\u00e9nocide de 1948, \u00ab&nbsp;l\u2019incitation directe et publique \u00e0 commettre le g\u00e9nocide&nbsp;\u00bb est un acte punissable,[footnote]Assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr","og_site_name":"eReader","article_modified_time":"2021-04-20T09:28:06+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr","url":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr","name":"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l'Holocauste : un cas particulier ? | eReader","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-04-20T09:10:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-20T09:28:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/la-defense-du-genocide-et-la-negation-de-lholocauste-un-cas-particulier\/?lang=fr#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Publications","item":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Modules de synth\u00e8se sur les litiges relatifs aux droits num\u00e9riques et \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 d&rsquo;expression en ligne","item":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/?lang=fr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Module 6 : Discours de haine","item":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/publications\/modules-de-synthese-sur-les-litiges-relatifs-aux-droits-numeriques-et-a-la-liberte-dexpression-en-ligne\/discours-de-haine\/?lang=fr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"La d\u00e9fense du g\u00e9nocide et la n\u00e9gation de l&rsquo;Holocauste : un cas particulier ?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/","name":"eReader","description":"Media Defence","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mediadefence.org\/ereader\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication-category?post=669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}